Intel Core i5-11600K review

Is the i5 11600K worth it?

0 1

The Intel Core i5-11600K is the mid-size answer to the great AMD Raison 5 5600X, with the same core and thread size and a more affordable price, especially when considering the current shortage of AMD processors.

With the launch of the 11th generation Intel processors, the Intel Core i5-11600k is probably the highlight of the entire generation and is easily the best processor ever made by Intel this year.

While this processor costs just $ 269 (£ 248, AU $ 419) compared to the $ 349 (£ 349, AU $ 549) price of the Raison 5 5600X, the Intel Core i5-11600K is probably the best processor. Players who don’t really need a high-end processor.

Price and usability

The proposed retail price of $ 262 was the Intel Core i5-11600K released on March 30, 2021. Now, it appears in most retailers for $ 269 (£ 248, AU $ 419), making it the processor Best value for the best players.

You should look at the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X to see why. AMD’s mid-range champion of six is ​​currently trading for $ 349 (£ 349, AU $ 549), a significant price increase. Now the AMD processor is a bit faster, but not as fast and is worth the extra $ 80.

Read This: Is HP Spectre x360 worth it?

Rocket Lake is largely a wasteful processor, and the Intel Core i5-11600K is a good buy for most gamers, but you’ll have to invest in a CPU cooler to deal with the high power draw and temperature. Previous generation.

Chipset and Latest Features

The Intel Core i5-11600K is based on Intel’s 11th generation Rocket Lake-S architecture and is again based on a 14nm manufacturing process. However, unlike the later generations, which were based on the Skylake architecture of the 2015 generation, Intel took the Ice Lake architecture from 7nm and moved it back to 14nm.

The main reason Intel did this was to be able to push the clock speed currently beyond 7nm. It is important for computer games. Now for the Core i9-11900K, this was a big drop, because Intel was forced to go back to an eight-core, 16-thread design, but for the Core i5 it takes a huge leap in performance generation. see later. Let’s go.

However, this additional performance is not free. The Intel Core i5-11600K consumes more power and is warmer than the Intel Core i5-10600K. It is not close.

- Advertisement -

Regardless of the Intel Core i5-10600 through something like Prime 95, it reaches a maximum power consumption of 95.15W. 11600K, on ​​the other hand, goes up to 180.74W, more than double that power. As a result, the temperature is much higher. Although the same cooler was used in the exact same tests, the Intel Core i5-11600K peaked at 76 C, a bigger jump than the 61 over C at 10600K.

That being said, for the first time, we recommend that everyone raising this processor go for a very powerful CPU cooler. It’s going to be hot.

In the past, this processor was made primarily for people who wanted to build a mid-size computer, but with the cooling and power that it needed, it would have to invest in both meat and other cooling. This is a PSU that can provide the amount of juice it sucks out of the wall, especially if you pair it with a powerful graphics card like the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080.

However, the best thing about this generation of Intel processors is the inclusion of support for PCIe 4.0. Intel has finally hooked up with AMD on desktop and will be able to use the fastest SSD on the market; that’s why we are starting to create the fastest SSD on the market. Suddenly.

Performance of Intel 11th Gen

When we reviewed the Intel Core i9-11900K, we strongly criticized it not only for its competition, but also because it lagged behind the previous generation Intel Core i9-10900K. The Core i5-10600K doesn’t have that problem.

Now, it lags behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with some workloads, including heavy workloads like Blender and Adobe Primer. Unsurprisingly, AMD has been extremely strong in these applications for several years. But since the Intel Core i5-11600K price comes at a price, gaming performance matters more because creative professionals are likely to jump for something a bit more expensive anyway.

The Intel Core i5-11600K Ryzen on 5 5600X doesn’t exactly draw water, but it does make trade-offs effectively. Our CPU test kit includes three gaming workloads, 3DMark Time Spy, Metro 1080p output on low settings, and Full War: three realms at 1080p on low settings. Intel comes in with a win in both the 3DMark CPU value and the Metro output. Your loss even throughout the war – Three Kingdoms is a 5% loss.

For a processor that is 30% cheaper than the Raison 5 5600X, you really won’t miss out if your main focus is playing your favorite computer games. The Core i5-11600K is a bit behind the base, but there is still enough room for more streaming via OBS, double that if you pair it with an amazing NVNC encoder with an Nvidia graphics card.

More importantly, how much improvement does the Core i5-11600K bring over the Core i5-10600K. Again, this is mainly due to high power consumption, but you are seeing a massive 24-44% increase in potential gaming activity.

Of course, you can’t expect to play anything at low 1080p settings with this graphics card, unless you’re really looking for the higher frames of sports titles, but this processor is less likely to be a hindrance. A high-end graphics card means you have more room to run the 360Hz gaming monitors that are just starting to hit the market.

All you have to do is build your own affordable gaming device and if you don’t think you can go the extra mile to create content, the Intel Core i5-11600K is the best processor on the market right now. You have to honestly struggle with controlled power consumption and temperature, which will add to your build cost once you have a power and cooling factor, but this could be the Intel processor you should buy.

The next generation of Intel is expected to release more than just a Core i5 processor worth buying, but until then the Intel Core i5-11600 will be the perfect chip for any computer player, as expected or not.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.